Just what Texas Needs: More Armed Lunatics at the Border

Well, that didn't take long. Various political sites have been discussion Howard Dean's prediction that immigration will be the wedge issue of choice in 2006 (assuming gay-bashing loses its potency which seems unlikely.)

Reported on Statesman.com :

Frustrated by a government that seems unable to stanch the flow of illegal immigrants, a Houston Republican has introduced legislation creating a civilian volunteer militia to patrol the nation's borders, armed with arrest power, guns and the approval to use "any force necessary."

Commanded by Gov. Rick Perry and other border-state governors, the Border Protection Corps would add another line of defense against terrorists, smugglers and gangs eager to prey upon the United States, U.S. Rep. John Culberson said.

Critics accused Culberson of fueling anti-immigrant attitudes with an impractical and potentially dangerous idea, but the three-term congressman said national security trumps all other concerns.

"My constituents and I are just flat fed up, and we need action immediately to prevent terrorists and other criminals from crossing over to the United States," Culberson said.

Emphasis added. Just as with the PATRIOT act, national security is being used as a beard to hide a police state agenda that guts Constitutional protections.

Guess who signed up as a co-sponsor of the monstrosity in question?

Though critics dismiss Culberson's numbers as unrealistic, 47 Republicans have signed on as co-sponsors, including U.S. Reps. Michael McCaul of Austin, John Carter of Round Rock and Lamar Smith of San Antonio, whose district includes most of downtown Austin.

"There is a growing concern in America over how porous the borders are," Smith said. "Clearly, there is a need for this. Clearly, the government is unable or unwilling to devote the personnel and resources necessary to secure the borders."

So, who's less than thrilled with the idea of a vigilante force patrolling the border?

Among others, Governor Goodhair, who doesn't want to be responsible for, well, anything, but certainly not for the impossible task of sealing the porous Tex-Mex border (with all the cultural implications thereof).

Perry, who thinks that border security is a federal, not a state, responsibility, issued a lukewarm statement on Culberson's bill (HR 3622).

"I welcome federal efforts to protect our borders from illegal immigration and threats from terrorists," Perry said. "Regardless of the mechanism, the federal government must provide a stronger presence along the border."

Those with actual Border Patrol experience (as opposed to study-flapping wonkery) show a cool reception to this idea as well:

"The border is way too dangerous to leave it to amateurs," said U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-El Paso, former chief of the U.S. Border Patrol in the McAllen and El Paso sectors.

"The atmosphere it would create, the potential for violating people's civil rights, the fact that these individuals . . . may not understand the culture, the areas, the overall challenge that they're facing — I don't think it's anything you want to even entertain at this point," he said.

Reyes advocates hiring more Border Patrol agents, who are trained in the complexities of immigration law and required to speak Spanish, stipulations not included in the militia bill.

Emphasis again added. What a novel idea. Communication that's not conveyed by the barrel of a gun.

Perish the thought.